Here is how every published pick compares with the current average. When the writer’s explanation is available, the note includes its main themes; when it is not, we stick to the pick and team rather than guessing.
CBS Sports has Trevor Goosby going No. 5, which falls in the premium top-five tier. The destination in this mock is TEN. The pick is 7.1 picks earlier than the weighted average and is one of the more optimistic projections on the board. The explanation tied to the pick focuses on roster need. This mock was published September 1, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
Sports Illustrated has Trevor Goosby going No. 5, which falls in the premium top-five tier. The destination in this mock is ATL. The pick is 7.1 picks earlier than the weighted average and is one of the more optimistic projections on the board. The explanation tied to the pick focuses on positional value. This mock was published August 21, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
CBS Sports has Trevor Goosby going No. 6, which falls in the top-ten range. The destination in this mock is TEN. The pick is 6.1 picks earlier than the weighted average and is one of the more optimistic projections on the board. The explanation tied to the pick focuses on size and length and consistency or health concerns. This mock was published September 1, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
CBS Sports has Trevor Goosby going No. 6, which falls in the top-ten range. The destination in this mock is LV. The pick is 6.1 picks earlier than the weighted average and is one of the more optimistic projections on the board. The explanation tied to the pick focuses on athleticism and burst, size and length, and positional value. This mock was published September 1, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
FantasyPros has Trevor Goosby going No. 6, which falls in the top-ten range. The destination in this mock is TEN. The pick is 6.1 picks earlier than the weighted average and is one of the more optimistic projections on the board. The explanation tied to the pick focuses on roster need, defense, and positional value. This mock was published May 1, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
DKDB has Trevor Goosby going No. 7, which falls in the top-ten range. The destination in this mock is ATL. The pick is 5.1 picks earlier than the weighted average and is one of the more optimistic projections on the board. The saved entry does not include enough of the writer’s commentary to fairly explain the reasoning. In this case, the pick itself is the takeaway, and the original article is the best place to get the full argument. This mock was published July 13, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
#7TENFOX Sports
Rob Rang · May 13, 2026
2027 Mock Draft: Arch Manning No. 1 Overall? 5 QBs Go in First Round Original ↗
FOX Sports has Trevor Goosby going No. 7, which falls in the top-ten range. The destination in this mock is TEN. The pick is 5.1 picks earlier than the weighted average and is one of the more optimistic projections on the board. The explanation tied to the pick focuses on size and length, long-term upside, and positional value. This mock was published May 13, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
Sports Illustrated has Trevor Goosby going No. 7, which falls in the top-ten range. The destination in this mock is ATL. The pick is 5.1 picks earlier than the weighted average and is one of the more optimistic projections on the board. The explanation tied to the pick focuses on athleticism and burst, production, size and length, and long-term upside. This mock was published April 28, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
Athlon Sports has Trevor Goosby going No. 8, which falls in the top-ten range. The destination in this mock is TEN. The pick is 4.1 picks earlier than the weighted average and is one of the more optimistic projections on the board. The saved entry does not include enough of the writer’s commentary to fairly explain the reasoning. In this case, the pick itself is the takeaway, and the original article is the best place to get the full argument. This mock was published August 20, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
WalterFootball has Trevor Goosby going No. 9, which falls in the top-ten range. The destination in this mock is SF. The pick is 3.1 picks earlier than the weighted average and is one of the more optimistic projections on the board. The saved entry does not include enough of the writer’s commentary to fairly explain the reasoning. In this case, the pick itself is the takeaway, and the original article is the best place to get the full argument. This mock was published August 31, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
PFF has Trevor Goosby going No. 10, which falls in the top-ten range. The destination in this mock is ATL. The pick is 2.1 picks earlier than the weighted average and is right in line with the overall average. The explanation tied to the pick focuses on roster need, early readiness, and positional value. This mock was published April 27, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
NFL Trade Rumors has Trevor Goosby going No. 11, which falls in the upper half of Round 1. The destination in this mock is NYG. The pick is 1.1 picks earlier than the weighted average and is right in line with the overall average. The explanation tied to the pick focuses on athleticism and burst, technique and decision-making, size and length, and long-term upside. This mock was published June 24, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
Bleacher Report has Trevor Goosby going No. 13, which falls in the upper half of Round 1. The destination in this mock is MIN. The pick is 0.9 picks later than the weighted average and is right in line with the overall average. The saved entry does not include enough of the writer’s commentary to fairly explain the reasoning. In this case, the pick itself is the takeaway, and the original article is the best place to get the full argument. This mock was published June 5, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
FanSided has Trevor Goosby going No. 13, which falls in the upper half of Round 1. The destination in this mock is MIN. The pick is 0.9 picks later than the weighted average and is right in line with the overall average. The explanation tied to the pick focuses on size and length. This mock was published June 11, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
Sharp Football Analysis has Trevor Goosby going No. 13, which falls in the upper half of Round 1. The destination in this mock is MIN. The pick is 0.9 picks later than the weighted average and is right in line with the overall average. The saved entry does not include enough of the writer’s commentary to fairly explain the reasoning. In this case, the pick itself is the takeaway, and the original article is the best place to get the full argument. This mock was published May 6, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
The Sporting News has Trevor Goosby going No. 13, which falls in the upper half of Round 1. The destination in this mock is NYJ. The pick is 0.9 picks later than the weighted average and is right in line with the overall average. The saved entry does not include enough of the writer’s commentary to fairly explain the reasoning. In this case, the pick itself is the takeaway, and the original article is the best place to get the full argument. This mock was published April 27, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
Yardbarker has Trevor Goosby going No. 13, which falls in the upper half of Round 1. The destination in this mock is NYJ. The pick is 0.9 picks later than the weighted average and is right in line with the overall average. The saved entry does not include enough of the writer’s commentary to fairly explain the reasoning. In this case, the pick itself is the takeaway, and the original article is the best place to get the full argument. This mock was published April 30, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
Draft Countdown has Trevor Goosby going No. 17, which falls in the back half of Round 1. The destination in this mock is CIN. The pick is 4.9 picks later than the weighted average and is a little more cautious than the rest of the group. The explanation tied to the pick focuses on consistency or health concerns and positional value. This mock was published August 19, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
FantasyPros has Trevor Goosby going No. 19, which falls in the back half of Round 1. The destination in this mock is DEN. The pick is 6.9 picks later than the weighted average and is a little more cautious than the rest of the group. The explanation tied to the pick focuses on long-term upside and positional value. This mock was published May 10, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
RotoBaller has Trevor Goosby going No. 19, which falls in the back half of Round 1. The destination in this mock is HOU. The pick is 6.9 picks later than the weighted average and is a little more cautious than the rest of the group. The explanation tied to the pick focuses on roster need, production, defense, and long-term upside. This mock was published May 8, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
#20KCAndydraft
Andy · July 9, 2026
Way Too Early 2027 NFL Mock Draft: Who Stands Out in Summer Scouting? Original ↗
Andydraft has Trevor Goosby going No. 20, which falls in the back half of Round 1. The destination in this mock is KC. The pick is 7.9 picks later than the weighted average and is a little more cautious than the rest of the group. The explanation tied to the pick focuses on roster need, athleticism and burst, technique and decision-making, and size and length. This mock was published July 9, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
Sharp Football Analysis has Trevor Goosby going No. 24, which falls in the back half of Round 1. The destination in this mock is KC. The pick is 11.9 picks later than the weighted average and is a little more cautious than the rest of the group. The saved entry does not include enough of the writer’s commentary to fairly explain the reasoning. In this case, the pick itself is the takeaway, and the original article is the best place to get the full argument. This mock was published April 30, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.
WalterFootball has Trevor Goosby going No. 25, which falls in the back half of Round 1. The destination in this mock is PHI. The pick is 12.9 picks later than the weighted average and is a little more cautious than the rest of the group. The explanation tied to the pick focuses on athleticism and burst. This mock was published June 16, 2026, so it reflects the board and team order available at that point in the draft cycle.