2028 WNBA DraftEarly live signal
2028 WNBA Mock Draft Consensus and Big Board
The consensus, source by source.
Compare the public 2028 WNBA mock drafts currently available and see each prospect’s projected range. Every vote links to the original work.
2Eligible mocks3 exact-year records reviewed
2Analysts2 independent publications
60ProspectsNames normalized across sources
LiveLast refreshSep 3, 2026
Unique-player assignment
Open expanded metrics →
2028 consensus board
Ranked by weighted average selection; each prospect appears once.
48 shown
RankProspectProjected teamAvg.MedianRangeMocksConfidence
1
SSSarah StrongF · UConn
—No team supplied
2.0weighted
2.0pick
1–3Tight range
2/2100% appearance
92Strong consensus
2
MBMikayla Blakes— · Vanderbilt
—No team supplied
2.0weighted
2.0pick
2–2Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
3
JEJoyce EdwardsF · South Carolina
—No team supplied
3.0weighted
3.0pick
2–4Tight range
2/2100% appearance
92Strong consensus
4
JDJazzy DavidsonG · USC
—No team supplied
3.0weighted
3.0pick
3–3Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
5
SBSienna BettsF · UCLA
—No team supplied
4.0weighted
4.0pick
4–4Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
6
JCJaloni CambridgeG · Ohio State
—No team supplied
5.0weighted
5.0pick
1–9Moderate range
2/2100% appearance
88Strong consensus
7
LMLiv McGill— · Florida
—No team supplied
5.0weighted
5.0pick
5–5Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
8
JCJustice CarltonF · Texas
—No team supplied
6.0weighted
6.0pick
6–6Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
9
OOOlivia Olson— · Michigan
—No team supplied
6.0weighted
6.0pick
6–6Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
10
TSTaliah Scott— · Baylor
—No team supplied
7.0weighted
7.0pick
7–7Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
11
ZJZaKiyah JohnsonG · LSU
—No team supplied
7.0weighted
7.0pick
7–7Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
12
AMAgot MakeerG · South Carolina
—No team supplied
8.0weighted
8.0pick
8–8Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
13
BWBerry Wallace— · Illinois
—No team supplied
8.0weighted
8.0pick
8–8Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
14
BPBritt Prince— · Nebraska
—No team supplied
9.0weighted
9.0pick
9–9Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
15
KSKennedy SmithF · USC
—No team supplied
10.0weighted
10.0pick
10–10Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
16
TFToby Fournier— · Duke
—No team supplied
10.0weighted
10.0pick
10–10Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
17
DCDani Carnegie— · Georgia
—No team supplied
11.0weighted
11.0pick
11–11Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
18
LWLauren WhittakerF · Gonzaga (New Zealand)
—No team supplied
11.0weighted
11.0pick
11–11Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
19
ARArianna RobinsonC · Duke
—No team supplied
12.0weighted
12.0pick
12–12Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
20
DGDelaney Gibb— · BYU
—No team supplied
12.0weighted
12.0pick
12–12Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
21
AHAva Heiden— · Iowa
—No team supplied
13.0weighted
13.0pick
13–13Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
22
LBLena BilićG · UCLA (Croatia)
—No team supplied
13.0weighted
13.0pick
13–13Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
23
KKKateryna KovalC · Notre Dame (Ukraine)
—No team supplied
14.0weighted
14.0pick
14–14Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
24
TWTalayah Walker— · Georgia Tech
—No team supplied
14.0weighted
14.0pick
14–14Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
25
KFKatie Fiso— · Oregon
—No team supplied
15.0weighted
15.0pick
15–15Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
26
JLJordan LeeG · Texas
—No team supplied
15.5weighted
15.5pick
15–16Tight range
2/2100% appearance
93Strong consensus
27
AZAllie ZiebellG · UConn
—No team supplied
16.0weighted
16.0pick
16–16Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
28
SSSyla SwordsG · Michigan (Canada)
—No team supplied
17.0weighted
17.0pick
17–17Tight range
2/2100% appearance
93Strong consensus
29
KBKennedy Blair— · Michigan State
—No team supplied
18.0weighted
18.0pick
18–18Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
30
MRMackenly RandolphF · Louisville
—No team supplied
18.0weighted
18.0pick
18–18Tight range
1/250% appearance
61Moderate consensus
31
AHAvery Howell— · Washington
—No team supplied
19.0weighted
19.0pick
19–19Tight range
1/1100% appearance
92Strong consensus
32
JWJadyn Wooten— · Oklahoma State
—No team supplied
20.0weighted
20.0pick
20–20Tight range
1/1100% appearance
92Strong consensus
33
MOMe’Arah O’NealC · Florida
—No team supplied
20.1weighted
20.0pick
5–35Extreme disagreement
2/2100% appearance
74Moderate consensus
34
LBLenee Beaumont— · Indiana
—No team supplied
21.0weighted
21.0pick
21–21Tight range
1/1100% appearance
92Strong consensus
35
TCTaylee Chirrick— · Montana State
—No team supplied
22.0weighted
22.0pick
22–22Tight range
1/1100% appearance
92Strong consensus
36
MHMila Holloway— · Michigan
—No team supplied
23.0weighted
23.0pick
23–23Tight range
1/1100% appearance
92Strong consensus
37
CWChazadi Wright— · Iowa
—No team supplied
24.0weighted
24.0pick
24–24Tight range
1/1100% appearance
92Strong consensus
38
TTTrinity Turner— · Georgia
—No team supplied
25.0weighted
25.0pick
25–25Tight range
1/1100% appearance
92Strong consensus
39
TMTori McKinney— · Minnesota
—No team supplied
26.0weighted
26.0pick
26–26Tight range
1/1100% appearance
92Strong consensus
40
TRTajianna Roberts— · Louisville
—No team supplied
27.0weighted
27.0pick
27–27Tight range
1/1100% appearance
92Strong consensus
41
JBJasmine Bascoe— · Villanova
—No team supplied
28.0weighted
28.0pick
28–28Tight range
1/1100% appearance
92Strong consensus
42
ATAllie Turner— · Gonzaga
—No team supplied
29.0weighted
29.0pick
29–29Tight range
1/1100% appearance
92Strong consensus
43
MRMeadow Roland— · UNLV
—No team supplied
30.0weighted
30.0pick
30–30Tight range
1/1100% appearance
92Strong consensus
44
LFLiz Freihofer— · Eastern Kentucky
—No team supplied
31.0weighted
31.0pick
31–31Tight range
1/1100% appearance
92Strong consensus
45
ARAva Renninger— · Fairleigh Dickinson
—No team supplied
32.0weighted
32.0pick
32–32Tight range
1/1100% appearance
92Strong consensus
46
ZJZamareya Jones— · NC State
—No team supplied
33.0weighted
33.0pick
33–33Tight range
1/1100% appearance
92Strong consensus
47
GOGrace Oliver— · Wake Forest
—No team supplied
34.0weighted
34.0pick
34–34Tight range
1/1100% appearance
92Strong consensus
48
MWMia Woolfolk— · Georgia
—No team supplied
36.0weighted
36.0pick
36–36Tight range
1/1100% appearance
92Strong consensus
No prospects match those filters.
Read this board correctly
Early projections are signal, not certainty.
Future team order is unsettled and some sources publish prospect boards without team assignments. The rank therefore prioritizes where players are selected, while the most-common team is shown only when sources actually supply one.
Calculation details