Early live signal · 2 eligible real-source mocks Read the methodology
UltimateBig Board.com
All six drafts
2028 WNBA DraftEarly live signal

2028 WNBA Mock Draft Consensus and Big Board

The consensus, source by source.

Compare the public 2028 WNBA mock drafts currently available and see each prospect’s projected range. Every vote links to the original work.

Explore the board Inspect every imported mock
2Eligible mocks4 exact-year records reviewed
2Analysts2 independent publications
60Tracked prospectsUnique names across all eligible mocks
LiveLast refreshOct 19, 2026
Read this board correctly

2028 WNBA mock draft sources and coverage

2 eligible mocks from 2 publications contribute to this snapshot. 4 exact-year records were reviewed; metadata-only records do not contribute selections.

Stored eligible source publication dates: –. Snapshot calculated: . Calculation time is separate from source publication dates.

The Mocks fraction counts sources naming a player over sources that either name that player or extend at least to that player's median pick. The denominator can differ by player: 1/1 means one covering mock, not agreement across every eligible mock. Appearance percentages describe this coverage, not draft probabilities.

The weighted average uses only selections naming that player, weighted for source recency and parsing confidence and balanced within each publication. The confidence score combines appearance coverage, pick spread and number of appearances; it is not a player's chance of being drafted. With fewer than three eligible mocks, source depth limits this early signal. Team labels appear only when sources supply them; future team order remains unsettled.

Review the included mocks · Read the calculation methodology

Unique-player assignment

2028 consensus board

Ranked by weighted average selection; each prospect appears once.

Open expanded metrics →
48 of 60 tracked shown

This ranking displays the top 48 prospects. The 60 tracked total includes every unique player appearing in an eligible source mock.

RankProspectProjected teamAvg.MedianRangeMocksConfidence
1 SSSarah StrongF · UConn —No team supplied 2.0weighted 2.0pick 1–3Tight range 2/2100% appearance 92Limited-source agreement 2 MBMikayla Blakes— · Vanderbilt —No team supplied 2.0weighted 2.0pick 2–2Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 3 JEJoyce EdwardsF · South Carolina —No team supplied 3.0weighted 3.0pick 2–4Tight range 2/2100% appearance 92Limited-source agreement 4 JDJazzy DavidsonG · USC —No team supplied 3.0weighted 3.0pick 3–3Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 5 SBSienna BettsF · UCLA —No team supplied 4.0weighted 4.0pick 4–4Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 6 JCJaloni CambridgeG · Ohio State —No team supplied 5.0weighted 5.0pick 1–9Moderate range 2/2100% appearance 88Limited-source agreement 7 LMLiv McGill— · Florida —No team supplied 5.0weighted 5.0pick 5–5Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 8 JCJustice CarltonF · Texas —No team supplied 6.0weighted 6.0pick 6–6Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 9 OOOlivia Olson— · Michigan —No team supplied 6.0weighted 6.0pick 6–6Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 10 TSTaliah Scott— · Baylor —No team supplied 7.0weighted 7.0pick 7–7Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 11 ZJZaKiyah JohnsonG · LSU —No team supplied 7.0weighted 7.0pick 7–7Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 12 AMAgot MakeerG · South Carolina —No team supplied 8.0weighted 8.0pick 8–8Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 13 BWBerry Wallace— · Illinois —No team supplied 8.0weighted 8.0pick 8–8Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 14 BPBritt Prince— · Nebraska —No team supplied 9.0weighted 9.0pick 9–9Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 15 KSKennedy SmithF · USC —No team supplied 10.0weighted 10.0pick 10–10Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 16 TFToby Fournier— · Duke —No team supplied 10.0weighted 10.0pick 10–10Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 17 DCDani Carnegie— · Georgia —No team supplied 11.0weighted 11.0pick 11–11Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 18 LWLauren WhittakerF · Gonzaga (New Zealand) —No team supplied 11.0weighted 11.0pick 11–11Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 19 ARArianna RobinsonC · Duke —No team supplied 12.0weighted 12.0pick 12–12Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 20 DGDelaney Gibb— · BYU —No team supplied 12.0weighted 12.0pick 12–12Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 21 AHAva Heiden— · Iowa —No team supplied 13.0weighted 13.0pick 13–13Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 22 LBLena BilićG · UCLA (Croatia) —No team supplied 13.0weighted 13.0pick 13–13Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 23 KKKateryna KovalC · Notre Dame (Ukraine) —No team supplied 14.0weighted 14.0pick 14–14Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 24 TWTalayah Walker— · Georgia Tech —No team supplied 14.0weighted 14.0pick 14–14Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 25 KFKatie Fiso— · Oregon —No team supplied 15.0weighted 15.0pick 15–15Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 26 JLJordan LeeG · Texas —No team supplied 15.5weighted 15.5pick 15–16Tight range 2/2100% appearance 93Limited-source agreement 27 AZAllie ZiebellG · UConn —No team supplied 16.0weighted 16.0pick 16–16Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 28 SSSyla SwordsG · Michigan (Canada) —No team supplied 17.0weighted 17.0pick 17–17Tight range 2/2100% appearance 93Limited-source agreement 29 KBKennedy Blair— · Michigan State —No team supplied 18.0weighted 18.0pick 18–18Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 30 MRMackenly RandolphF · Louisville —No team supplied 18.0weighted 18.0pick 18–18Tight range 1/250% appearance 61Single-source signal 31 AHAvery Howell— · Washington —No team supplied 19.0weighted 19.0pick 19–19Tight range 1/1100% appearance 92Single-source signal 32 JWJadyn Wooten— · Oklahoma State —No team supplied 20.0weighted 20.0pick 20–20Tight range 1/1100% appearance 92Single-source signal 33 MOMe’Arah O’NealC · Florida —No team supplied 20.1weighted 20.0pick 5–35Extreme disagreement 2/2100% appearance 74Early evidence 34 LBLenee Beaumont— · Indiana —No team supplied 21.0weighted 21.0pick 21–21Tight range 1/1100% appearance 92Single-source signal 35 TCTaylee Chirrick— · Montana State —No team supplied 22.0weighted 22.0pick 22–22Tight range 1/1100% appearance 92Single-source signal 36 MHMila Holloway— · Michigan —No team supplied 23.0weighted 23.0pick 23–23Tight range 1/1100% appearance 92Single-source signal 37 CWChazadi Wright— · Iowa —No team supplied 24.0weighted 24.0pick 24–24Tight range 1/1100% appearance 92Single-source signal 38 TTTrinity Turner— · Georgia —No team supplied 25.0weighted 25.0pick 25–25Tight range 1/1100% appearance 92Single-source signal 39 TMTori McKinney— · Minnesota —No team supplied 26.0weighted 26.0pick 26–26Tight range 1/1100% appearance 92Single-source signal 40 TRTajianna Roberts— · Louisville —No team supplied 27.0weighted 27.0pick 27–27Tight range 1/1100% appearance 92Single-source signal 41 JBJasmine Bascoe— · Villanova —No team supplied 28.0weighted 28.0pick 28–28Tight range 1/1100% appearance 92Single-source signal 42 ATAllie Turner— · Gonzaga —No team supplied 29.0weighted 29.0pick 29–29Tight range 1/1100% appearance 92Single-source signal 43 MRMeadow Roland— · UNLV —No team supplied 30.0weighted 30.0pick 30–30Tight range 1/1100% appearance 92Single-source signal 44 LFLiz Freihofer— · Eastern Kentucky —No team supplied 31.0weighted 31.0pick 31–31Tight range 1/1100% appearance 92Single-source signal 45 ARAva Renninger— · Fairleigh Dickinson —No team supplied 32.0weighted 32.0pick 32–32Tight range 1/1100% appearance 92Single-source signal 46 ZJZamareya Jones— · NC State —No team supplied 33.0weighted 33.0pick 33–33Tight range 1/1100% appearance 92Single-source signal 47 GOGrace Oliver— · Wake Forest —No team supplied 34.0weighted 34.0pick 34–34Tight range 1/1100% appearance 92Single-source signal 48 MWMia Woolfolk— · Georgia —No team supplied 36.0weighted 36.0pick 36–36Tight range 1/1100% appearance 92Single-source signal
Across the draft network

Compare related mock draft consensus boards

Move between adjacent NFL, NBA and WNBA draft classes without losing the source-attributed context.

Read this board correctly

Early projections are signal, not certainty.

Future team order is unsettled and some sources publish prospect boards without team assignments. The rank therefore prioritizes where players are selected, while the most-common team is shown only when sources actually supply one.

Calculation details